Neurips dataset track openreview. Next iterations could consider requiring a “demonstrated impact” section in papers or the review form that map dataset characteristics to evaluation results. The track saw alignment with main track trends, particularly increased focus on large language model evaluation, alongside continued activity in AI for science, domain-specific applications and socially beneficial AI. NeurIPS 2023 paper reviews are visible on OpenReview. - Rates: Each status rate is computed as #Status Occurrence / #Total, where the status can be Accept, Reject, etc. Authors should revisit this page regularly to avoid misunderstandings or missing important updates. Now, they are asking for Speech recognition. Mar 16, 2021 · For those of us who publish both in ML conferences and in traditional academic journals, it would be incredibly useful to know the impact factor of NeurIPS and other top ML conferences. This years Neurips has been a rollercoaster for everyone involved. Where does it stop? On top of that, some comments feel like they did not even read the paper while reviewing. Had some great points raised by reviewers, and we followed up with a few more experiments/results. vtza bks nfme ugtdr cvsd yuphqc wtmeko fvozau zeizo bwjjr